.357 Ruger Blackhawk Accuracy Loads

A favorite load that seems to work well in any .357 Magnum revolver, including my stainless steel Ruger Blackhawk, is 15.7 grains of Winchester’s 296 propellant and the Hornady 158-grain jacketed hollow point bullet. I use standard rather than magnum primers. This was a 25-yard target.

The .357 Ruger Blackhawk

Ruger’s Blackhawk is an iconic firearm, one that’s been in production since the 1950s in one form or another. I bought my first one in a department store in Texas for under a hundred bucks back in the mid-1970s, and I’ve bought and sold several since.  I wish I had not sold any of the Blackhawks.

I’ve owned a few .357 Magnums over the years…Rugers, a couple of Model 27 Smiths, a Model 28 Smith (remember that one?), a Model 19 Smith, and a Model 65 Smith.  I’ve owned a couple of Colt Pythons, too.   The Pythons were nice, but not nice enough to command the premium prices they pulled in the 1970s, and certainly not nice enough to pull the exorbitant amounts they sell for today.  The Smiths were accurate, but they didn’t hold up under constant use with magnum loads.  I had a new Model 27 that I wore out in a couple of seasons in the metallic silhouette game; it suffered from extreme gas cutting under the top strap and a cylinder that sashayed around like an exotic dancer in a room full of big tippers.  The Ruger Blackhawks seem to last forever.

Every Ruger firearm manufactured in 1976 carries the 200th year bicentennial stamp, just like the one on my 200th year Blackhawk.   On my gun, the liberty scrollmark is on top of the barrel.

I’m down to one .357 Magnum now and it’s a 200th year stainless steel Blackhawk with a 6 1/2-inch barrel.  It’s one of my favorite revolvers and it’s not for sale (it never will be; I learned my lesson about letting good guns get away).  I have a few favorite .357 Magnum loads I’ve used over the last 50 years.  I thought it might be a good idea to document how they did in the Blackhawk, try a few more to see how they do, and share it all with you here on the ExNotes blog.  I guess this is the appropriate place for the disclaimer:  These are loads that work well in my Blackhawk.   You should never just take these loads (or any others from the Internet) and simply run with them.  Always consult a reputable reloading manual (I like the Hornady and Lyman manuals best).  Always start with lower charges and work your way up, looking for any signs of excess pressure, and go no higher if you see signs of excess pressure.  Okay, so that’s out of the way.  Let’s get to the good stuff.

Last week’s .357 Magnum testing at the West End Gun Club.

.357 Magnum Accuracy Loads

I’ve played with a lot of different .357 Magnum loads over the years.   I have a few favorite .357 Mag loads that have been superbly accurate in any of the .357 sixguns I’ve owned.  That’s a bit unusual because frequently a load that is accurate in one gun won’t be accurate in another, but that rule doesn’t seem to apply here.  The loads I like have worked well for me in any .357 I’ve ever shot.  I verified these loads in my Blackhawk with this latest round of testing, and like I said above, I explored a few more loads.

A few of the loads tested for this blog. From left to right, the first five are .357 Magnum cartridges and the last three are .38 Special cartridges (you can fire .38 Special rounds in a .357 Magnum handgun). The bullets (from left to right) are the 110-grain Hornady jacketed hollow point, the 158-grain Hornady jacketed hollow point, the 158-grain Hornady jacketed flat point, the Xtreme 158-grain plated flatpoint, a cast 158-grain flatpoint, a cast 158-grain flatpoint in a .38 Special case, a powder-coated 158-grain semi-wadcutter in a .38 Special case, and the Missouri 148-grain double-ended wadcutter in a .38 Special case.

So, with the above as background info, let’s get into the loads.  I’ll start with one of the standard “go to” .357 Magnum loads.  That’s the 158-grain cast semi-wadcutter bullet (the Keith-style) over 7.0 grains of Unique.  This is not the hottest .357 load (it’s a mild-recoiling .357 Magnum load), but it’s hot enough, it’s very accurate, and it’s relatively flat shooting.  I have a guy who casts 158-grain flatpoint bullets for me and I like those with 7.0 grains of Unique even better than the semi-wadcutter bullets.  The load is very consistent, and with the same zero and six o’clock hold I use at 50 feet (seen in the target below), I pretty much hit right on target at 25 yards, 50 yards, and yep, even at 100 yards.  I was hitting a steel gonger last week at 100 yards consistently with this load.  My shooting buddies were impressed, and after all, that’s what a lot of this is all about.   This is a good load.

A 50-ft target with the .357 Blackhawk using 158-grain cast flatpoints with 7.0 grains of Unique. Like they say, this is close enough for government work.

For hotter .357 Magnum loads, any of the Hornady 158-grain jacketed bullets (hollow points, flat points, and full metal jacket flat points) work superbly well with 15.7 grains of Winchester’s 296 propellant.  These loads have a distinctive bark, high velocities, snappy recoil, and they are superbly accurate.

15.7 grains of WW 296 and the 158-grain Hornady jacketed flat point resulted in the best group fired in this test series. Two shots went through the hole in the lower right.

Another long time favorite load is a bit unusual but it’s accurate as hell.  That’s the 110-grain Hornady jacketed hollow point and a max Unique load (10.0  grains of Unique, as listed in a Hornady reloading manual from the 1970s).  I first tried this one 40 years ago when I had a Colt Python and I was impressed with its accuracy.  I tried it again in this test series and the results were similarly impressive.  It’s probably the fastest load I tested because of the max load and the light bullets.  My old Hornady manual indicates the 110 grain Hornady bullet with 10.0 grains of Unique exits the muzzle at 1450 feet per second.  That’s fast.

If light bullets and high velocity float your boat, try this one (but work your way up to it): 10.0 grains of Unique with Hornady’s 110-grain jacketed hollow point.

Plated Bullets:  Are They Any Good?

Surprisingly, the 158-grain plated flatpoint bullets I tested didn’t do well with any charge of Unique, and in the past, they have performed very poorly with 296 (the bullets frequently shed their plating in the bore).  These plated bullets are offered by Berry and Xtreme.  These are not jacketed bullets; the copper plating is chemically applied and the coating is very thin.  I did get one decent showing with a lower-end charge of IMR 4227 propellant, but given the choice, I’d go for a plain cast bullet rather than plated bullets.   You may feel differently.  Please leave a comment here on the blog if your experience is different than mine.

Powder Coating and Paint Fumes

I tried powder-coated bullets last week, too, to see how they would perform.  Powder coating is a concept that’s been around for a few years as an alternative to lubing cast bullets.   I found that accuracy was more or less on par with lubed bullets, but not really any better.  The powder-coated bullets look cool (the cartridges kind of look like lipstick).  When I fired several powder-coated bullets fairly quickly, I could smell the paint.   Some folks swear by these bullets and love them for IDPA and similar competitive pistol events.  For me, performance was the same as conventional cast bullets.  Your mileage may vary.  Leave us a comment if you feel differently.

Powder-coated 158-grain semi-wadcutter bullets. I found their accuracy to be comparable to conventional cast and lubed bullets.

A Metallic Silhouette Load

When I shot metallic silhouette competition I used a 200-grain cast roundnose bullet in my .357 Magnum Model 27 Smith and Wesson.  That bullet worked extremely well, and because of its heavy-for-caliber nature and high length/diameter ratio, it carried a lot of energy downrange.  It was superbly accurate with 12.4 grains of 296.  But finding those bullets is next-to-impossible today.  It used to be a standard .38 Special bullet for police duty, but very few (if any) departments carry .38s today, and nobody seems to stock the 200-grain bullets.  Maybe I need to get back into casting.  I sure loved that 200-grain bullet in the .357 Magnum.  They actually made the .357 Magnum work better on the 200-meter rams than a 240-grain .44 Magnum.  The .44 Magnum wouldn’t consistently take down the rams; the 200-grain .357 Magnum did so every time.

.38 Special Loads

One of the great things about a .357 Magnum handgun is you can also shoot .38 Special loads in it.  I guess that’s a good thing, as the .38 Special cartridges have lighter recoil.  I tried three .38 Special loads with three different bullets.  The accuracy load in .38 Special is a 148-grain wadcutter bullet seated flush with the cartridge mouth over 2.7 grains of Bullseye propellant.  That load is super accurate in my Model 52 Smith and Wesson target pistol, and it did okay in the Ruger, too.  I’ve always believed that a .38 Special cartridge would never be quite as accurate in a .357 Magnum handgun because the bullet has to make a longer jump to reach the rifling, and my testing last week did nothing to change my mind on that count.   The .38 Special does okay in a .357 Magnum handgun, but I believe the best accuracy resides in a .357 case.

.357 and .38 Accuracy Testing Results

Here’s a chart summarizing my accuracy results:

Ruger Blackhawk accuracy testing results. All testing was with a two-hand hold at 50 feet. All groups are five shots.  All loads (except the plated bullet loads) were crimped.  All cast bullets were sized to 0.358.  Note 1:  Two shots went off paper.  Notes 2 and 3:  One shot went off paper.

There you have it.  If you have a load that works well, please leave a comment.  We’d love to hear from you.


Why you should click on those popup ads!


We have a bunch more good stuff on reloading, guns, and other shooting sports information.  You can find it all on our Tales of the Gun pages.


Click on those popup ads!


Buy RCBS reloading equipment here!


Never miss an ExNotes blog.  Subscribe for free!

The new Colt Python

Colt’s ad for the new Python. I have high hopes for this gun.

The Colt Python was the king of the handgun world back in the ’60s and ’70s.  It was the Rolls Royce of revolvers.  I owned two of them at different times in the mid-’70s.  I bought one while I was deployed overseas in Korea (we could actually order guns through the base exchange) and it was delivered to me in Korea.  I paid something like $150 for it back then, and it was sleek…deep bluing (Colt called it Royal Blue), a 6-inch barrel, and then I had to worry about bringing it back to the US.   I was told I would need a certificate signed by the Director of the Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms Bureau and I could only imagine how long that would take, but it didn’t take long at all.  I submitted the request and three weeks later I had a hard copy (this was the 1970s) signed in ink by the actual top guy at the ATF.   That gun came back to America with me in a duffel bag.  I remember that 10 grains of Unique behind a 110-grain jacketed hollowpoint Hornady tore one ragged hole at 25 yards.  It was phenomenally accurate.

I traded that Python for a new Ruger No. 1 in .30 06 and a couple of boxes of .30 06 ammo, and I still have that rifle.   But back at Fort Bliss I missed the Python.   Good buddy Roy told me I could order one through the Fort Bliss Rifle and Pistol Club, so I did (this time in nickel, but still a 6-incher).   It was stunning, with flawless nickel plating and a absolutely jewel-like, luxurious look.  The I sold that one when I moved to Fort Worth.  It was not my brightest move ever.  I’ve done a lot of dumb things in my life.  This was definitely one of them.

Colt quit making the Python several years ago, and prices went through the roof.  An original Python goes for something around $3k, give or take a K or two (almost always to the north).  Big bucks, and way more than I want to spend.

Pete’s Python. It’s one of the originals, and it is phenomenally accurate.

I sort of got the Python fever again a few months ago when good buddy Python Pete let me take a few shots with his vintage 8-inch barreled Python.   It was the accuracy that got me excited.   These were great revolvers.  I wrote about that day here.

And then suddenly, just a few weeks ago, Colt announced that they were reintroducing the Python, and it would retail at $1500.   That was a good thing, I thought.  It’s still pricey, but a new Python would be great.   Maybe when the supply exceeds the demand prices might drop, I thought.

I want the new Python to succeed.  A frontline company like Colt (an iconic name if ever there was one) deserves nothing less.


More Tales of the Gun stories here!

Ruger’s .357 Blackhawk

My stainless .357 Blackhawk, with a 25-yard target. It’s one of my favorite handguns.  The loads you see here use WW 296 propellant and Hornady’s 158-grain jacketed h0llow point bullet.

One of my good buddies wrote to me over the weekend asking about the Ruger Blackhawk in .357 Magnum.  He wanted to know if I felt they were good guns.  In a word:  Yes.  My friend was specifically considering the .357 Blackhawk with the extra cylinder for 9mm ammo; I’m not a big fan of the combo Blackhawks (I think they’re a solution to a problem that doesn’t exist).  But the basic .357 Blackhawk?   It’s a winner, and I think it’s one of the world’s great handguns.

I’ve owned several .357 Blackhawks over the last 50 years, starting with a plain vanilla blue steel New Model I bought at a K-Mart when I lived in El Paso (yep, they used to sell handguns).  I traded that one away, and then I bought an Old Model Blackhawk with the convertible 9mm cylinder.   It was a pristine used gun, still in the original box, with the shorter 4 5/8-inch barrel.  I never fired that gun and I only owned it for about a week.  I paid something like $75 for it, and then I sold it to my boss at Fort Bliss a few days later because he wanted it.   That Old Model with its convertible 9mm cylinder would be collectible today.  Eh, live and learn, I guess.

There were two convertible Blackhawks back in the 1970s, and I guess there are still two available new today.  One is the 9mm/.357 combo I described above; the other is the .45 ACP/.45 Colt deal.  I had a New Model Blackhawk .45 ACP/.45 Colt around the same time as I bought that Old Model 9mm/.357.  I only shot .45 ACP in it because I had a ready supply of .45 ACP ammo.  Mine wasn’t very accurate.  It might have been because the .45 ACP bullet had to make a big jump to the rifling (it’s a shorter cartridge), or it might have been that I just had the wrong .45 ACP load for that revolver.  I think the same accuracy detractors exist with the 9mm/.357 arrangement. The accuracy challenge is perhaps even more significant for the 9mm Blackhawk because of the slight difference in bore diameters between the 9mm and the .357 (the barrel diameter is .357 inches; the 9mm bullets are .355 or .356 inches in diameter).  If you have the .357 Blackhawk with the extra 9mm cylinder, you can actually shoot three cartridges in it (9mm from the one cylinder, and 38 Special and 357 Magnum from the other).  But I don’t have an interest in any of that.  I only shoot .357 Magnum in mine.

My .357 Blackhawk is the stainless model you see in the photo above.  It’s accurate (I can usually hold all my shots in the 10-ring of a silhouette target at 25 yards). They are super strong and I think they are more rugged than a Smith and Wesson. I sold all my S&W 357s years ago. And on that subject, I owned a couple of Colt Pythons back in the 1970s and I sold them, too. I never understand all the excitement over the Pythons; their fit and finish was great, but they didn’t shoot any better than the Blackhawk (at least in my hands).

No targets? No problem. My Blackhawk is a shooter.

There are several variants of the Blackhawk; I have the full-sized Blackhawk with the 6½-inch barrel.  I like the feel of it, I like the grip, and as a kid who grew up watching Westerns, I like the idea of a single-action sixgun.  Today, Ruger makes several variants of their .357 Blackhawk.  There are fixed-sight versions they call the Vaquero, smaller frame versions they call the flat top, different barrel lengths, stainless models, blue steel models, and more.   I like the stainless version because the grip is made of steel; in the blue version it’s anodized aluminum. The stainless grip is a little heavier and the gun feels better to me. But there’s nothing wrong with the blued-steel Blackhawk. They are great guns.

My Blackhawk was manufactured in 1976, and like all Rugers built that year, it carries the “Made in the 200th Year of American Liberty” rollmark.

I like loading the .357 ammo, too, and I loaded a bunch this weekend. It’s a cool cartridge to reload. WW 296 is my preferred propellant. Unique does okay, too, but 296 is the cat’s meow for the .357 Magnum cartridge.  It’s a flat-shooting cartridge, and I can hit consistently with it all the way out to 200 yards.   I may set up a target or two at that distance the next time I’m on the range just to back up that statement.


Want more?  Check out our other Tales of the Gun stories!

A Pair of Prancing Ponies…and that first No. 1

Good buddy Python Pete and I went to the range a few days ago to let loose with a pair of prancing ponies (that is to say, Colts), in both revolver and automatic flavors.  The auto was my tried-and-true bright stainless Colt Government Model 1911; the wheelgun was Pete’s stunning 8-inch Colt Python.   Both are stunningly beautiful and both are good shooting guns.

A custom bright stainless Colt, with Baer barrel, Millet sights, and a few other nice touches.

I bought the 1911 you see above at a pawn shop brand new back in the mid-1980s for just over $500.   Colt no longer offers bright stainless steel guns, so I guess you could say mine is collectible, and when you see bright stainless Colt 1911s come up for sale (which doesn’t happen very often), prices start at $2,000 and go north from there.  I guess you could say I made a good investment (except I won’t ever sell it).

A few years ago the front sight popped off my 1911, so I took it to a local gunsmith to have it restaked. That repair lasted all of 50 rounds, and I realized I needed to see an expert.  That’s when I hooked up with TJ’s Custom Guns, and I had TJ revamp the Colt.  It’s got a Les Baer match barrel, an extended one-piece guide rail, an engine turned chamber (I love that look), high profile/high visibility Millet fixed sights, and TJ’s exclusive high reliability tune.  That last little bit means that my Colt 1911 will reliably feed any bullet configuration (semi-wadcutters, hollow points, etc.) and it will work no matter what.   Folks, I’ve put tens of thousands of rounds through my 1911 since TJ massaged it, and it’s never had a failure of any kind (no failures to fire, no failures to feed, and no failures to eject…it just goes and goes and goes).

On to the Python.  I’ve known good buddy Pete for more than 30 years (we sort of grew up together in the aerospace industry).  Pete owns a Colt Python, a gun that is arguably the finest revolver ever made.  His is the super-rare 8-inch model, too.

Revolver royalty…the stunning Colt Python. The Colt Python is perhaps the finest revolver ever made.

Colt no longer makes the Python, probably because they were too expensive to produce.  The fit and finish are superior, and the feel of the thing is just sublime.  It’s a .357 Magnum, one of the world’s all time greats, and a cartridge that dominated the police market before 9mm became all the rage.  Colt revolvers were hand-fitted and involved lots of custom assembly, and I suppose it just didn’t in with the need for low cost manufacture in a market dominated by black plastic 9mm handguns.   No, the Python is from another era characterized by highly polished blue steel and finely figured walnut, an age in which I felt more comfortable.   Seeing a Python on the firing line again was a treat, and when Pete asked if I wanted to try the big Colt, he didn’t have to ask twice.

Pete and I had four handguns with us (the two mentioned above, plus a SIG 9mm and my Rock Island Compact 1911).   I shot my two 1911s offhand for a while, and then I tried my luck with Pete’s SIG and the Python.  It was fun.

You can argue about a good automatic being as accurate as a high-end revolver, but you won’t convince me. The Python is a tack driver.

I fired 5 shots of “nothing fancy” factory ammo with the Python, and the accuracy was superb.   The targets don’t lie, folks.

I’ve owned two Pythons in my life, and both were back in the 1970s.   When I was in Korea, I found out I could order one though the Base Exchange at a substantial discount.  I couldn’t believe what the nice lady was telling me at the Kunsan AFB Exchange, so I ordered a 6-inch blue steel Python for something like $150 (it sounded too good to be true).   Incredibly, it came in the mail to me in Korea.  Before I rotated home, I had to submit a form through the Army to get permission to import the revolver back to the US.  I did that, and a few weeks later I had a letter signed by the Director of the Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms Bureau allowing me to bring my Python home.  It went into my duffel bag, I produced the letter when I went through Customs in San Francisco, and that was that.  Better times.

You know how it goes with these things.  When I was back in Texas shortly after my stint in Korea, I saw a Ruger No. 1 single shot rifle in .30 06 I couldn’t live without, and I traded the Python for it (the guy at the store through in a couple of boxes of .30 06 ammo, too).  Then I felt a void in my life because I no longer owned a Python, so I ordered another one (this time a 6-inch nickel-plated model) through the Fort Bliss Gun Club.  It was under $200.   Then I traded that for something else (I can’t remember what).  Ah, the mistakes we make.  But maybe they weren’t all mistakes.  I’ve sent a lot of lead downrange with the Ruger No. 1 over the last 45 years, it’s one of the most accurate rifles I own, and it has stunning walnut.

The Ruger No. 1 in 30 06 I traded the Kunsan Python to get. It’s a 200th Year Ruger.  I miss the Python, but I love my ’06 No. 1.  Some day I’ll do a blog on this rifle.

Today, Colt Pythons typically sell for something in the $3,000 to $4,000 range.   Pete’s would command even more, because it’s the 8-incher, which is a rare item.  I’ve asked Pete if he wanted to sell his, but all I got in return was a smile.  That’s probably just as well; I couldn’t afford it at today’s prices.


Whoa!  More gun stories?  You bet, and they’re right here!


Sign up for our automatic blog email updates!


Need targets?   Get them here, like we do!



Never miss an ExNotes blog!


Hit those pop up ads…it’s what keeps us going!