Tag: 5744

1903 Springfield Cast and Jacketed Loads

This is an update on my latest 1903 Springfield load development work.

I purchased this rifle about three years ago assuming the headspace was correct, but it wasn’t.  That’s a risk associated with old military rifles.  Rifle parts are often mixed through the years, and when doing so with the bolt and the barreled action, it’s easy to induce an excess headspace condition.  That’s what I encountered on my rifle, so I had the Civilian Marksmanship Program (CMP) in Anniston, Alabama install a new 1903 barrel and rechamber the rifle.  Live and learn, I guess.  Always check the headspace when purchasing a milsurp rifle.

As it was returned to me from the CMP the rifle shot to the right and jacketed bullets shot way too high (at least I thought it shot way too high, but I was wrong…more on that in a bit).  I  noticed that the front sight was biased to the left (which made the rifle shoot to the right).  I drifted the front sight in its base (it’s a dovetail fitting).  The front sight takes a retaining screw that secures it to the barrel mount, and on my rifle that screw was missing.  It might have shipped that way from the CMP or it might have fallen out.

When the Springfield was returned to me from the CMP, the front sight was biased to the left, as you see here.  I didn’t notice it at first.
A replacement front sight screw.

I wrote to the CMP regarding the missing front sight screw, but I haven’t heard from them and I found a replacement front sight screw on the Sarco website.  I haven’t installed it yet (that will come later).  I drifted the front sight in its dovetail to the right, and that brought the point of impact closer to the point of aim.

Before I get into the reloading specifics, I should explain a bit about the rear sight.  The rear sight on the 1903 Springfield rifle is a complicated device.  It’s called the M1905 rear sight, and it is designed and calibrated for standard military ball ammo (back in the day when the Army used .30 06 ball ammo).   The sight is a ladder type rear sight and it has four aiming methods.  One is the battlesight zero (it’s with the ladder down); the other three are with the ladder up which allows adjusting for various distances.  In the big photo at the top of this blog, you see the rear sight with the ladder up.  In the photo below, you see the rear sight with the ladder down.

The M1905 rear sight assembly on the 1903 Springfield rifle. The sight ladder is in the down, or battlesight zero position. Wow, there’s a lot going on there.

This first aiming method is through the battlesight zero notch with the ladder down. Battlesight zero means the bullet will coincide with the point of aim at 547 yards.  The thought is that if you hold center of mass on a man-sized target at any distance up to 547 yards, you’ll hit the target.  At 100 yards the rifle will shoot way high with the ladder down using the battlesight zero, which is what I experienced.  I did not understand this was a normal occurrence when using the battlesight zero rear sight notch.

The 1903 Springfield’s rear sight in the raised position.  Note that the sides of the rear sight force the crossbar to the left as distance to the target increases.  That’s a built-in feature to compensate for bullet drift to the right at longer distances.  Clever people, those Army engineers were.  This rifle is over 100 years old.

The other three aiming methods all involve shooting with the ladder up (as you see in the above photo).   You can adjust for various ranges from 100 yards out to 2800 yards (which is roughly a mile and a half) by loosening the crossbar lock screw and sliding the crossbar up or down to various indicated ranges on the ladder.  One sighing method uses the crossbar upper notch.  You simply slide the crossbar up or down so that the top of the notch aligns with the estimated distance to the target (in yards) on the ladder’s distance graduations.  Another sighting method uses the crossbar lower notch.  In this case, you slide the crossbar up or down so that the top of this lower notch aligns with the estimated distance to the target.  The last sighting method involves using the crossbar aperture. There’s a horizonal scribe line across the plate containing this aperture, and when using the aperture, you align that scribe line with the estimated distance to the target.  The aperture allows zeroing the rifle for ranges as close at 100 yards, which is where I do most of my shooting.

All the above is calibrated for standard military .30 06 ball ammo.  If you’re shooting cast bullet ammo, or jacketed ammo with bullet weights or velocities other than standard ball ammo, you have to zero your rifle for your specific load.

There’s one other bit of coolness incorporated into the design of this rear sight.  The sight ladder is designed so that as you raise the crossbar, the sighting notches and aperture move to the left.  That’s to compensate for the bullet’s natural drift to the right as distances increase.

It’s all very clever, but in my opinion the Army made it too complicated. The rear sight was probably designed by an engineer who never had to carry or use a rifle in the field or train recruits to do so.  I think most of the guys I served with in the Army would have a hard time remembering all this (I’m an engineer and I struggled to understand it).  Apparently the Army agreed:  They simplified the rear sight on the later 1903A3 rifle.  The 1903A3 rear sight is much better for an infantry rifle.

That’s enough background on the 1903 Springfield sights.  Let’s get to the reloading variables and which loads the Springfield likes.  I prepped several, and I also grabbed some of the ammo I had previously loaded for the M1 Garand.

Four bullets used in this testing. From left to right: The Hursman 173-grain cast bullet, the Montana 210-grain cast bullet, the Winchester 150 grain jacketed soft point bullet, and the jacketed Speer 168-grain Match bullet.
The Hursman cast bullet loaded in a .30 06 cartridge.

I first fired at a 5o-yard silhouette target to see where the bullets were hitting (there’s lots of real estate on that target).  With the ladder down, the point of impact was to the right and low using the 17.0-grain Trail Boss and 173-grain Hursman bullet load.  With the ladder up, it moved left a little and printed higher using the higher rear sight notch.  For that 0.793 group up top, I used the bottom edge of the upper left box as the aimpoint.  For the other two groups, it was the bottom of the orange bullseye.

An initial target shot with cast bullets and Trail Boss powder. There’s a lot of real estate on this target, so I could see where the rifle was shooting.

I shot groups at 50 yards with several different loads using combinations of the bullets shown above and SR 4759, Trail Boss, 5744, and IMR 4064 propellants, all at 50 yards, and all with neck-sized-only .30 06 brass.  Then I returned a week later and fired groups with the 150-grain jacketed Winchester bullets (again at 50 yards).

After shooting the above groups, I had 20 rounds left with the Trail Boss,  Hursman bullet, and SR 4759 load.  I shot two of them at a clump of dirt at about 80 yards and hit it (I think) both times.   Then I put a 100-yard small bore rifle target up at 100 yards and shot at it with the 173-grain cast bullet SR 4759 load (8 rounds were crimped, and 10 rounds were not).  To my surprise, all 18 rounds were on the paper and 14 of the 18 were in the black.  It’s not that great a 100-yard group, but it shows potential.  All this was with the ladder down using  the battlesight zero sighting approach, so with cast bullets this rifle (at least with the SR 4759 load) is pretty much in the ballpark.

Cast bullets at 100 yards using the battlesight zero rear sight.

For the jacketed loads, I used the 150-grain Winchester jacketed soft point bullet (I bought a bunch of these a few years ago when somebody had them on sale) and 48.0 grains of IMR 4064.  This is the accuracy load in the Lyman reloading manual with a 150-grain jacketed bullet, and I know from prior development work it is superbly accurate in my Model 70.  It is also a minimum load, which is nice given the 1903’s steel buttplate.  The 1903 did well at 50 yards with the Winchester bullets, so I posted another silhouette target at 100 yards.  I fired three rounds and it was rough shooting at that target.  Using the aperture, I literally could not see the orange bullseye at 100 yards when I focused on the front sight.  The orange bullseye disappeared until I shifted my focus to the target.  I’d acquire the bullseye, then rapidly shift my focus to the front sight and squeeze the trigger.  I did that three times, literally firing blind, and managed to get a 3.050-inch 3-shot group.

The 150-grain jacketed Winchester bullet load at 100 yards. I couldn’t keep the orange bullseye visible using the aperture at 100 yards.

I figured it was time to quit while I was ahead.  I didn’t have any more black bullseye targets with me.  I knew I would be able to see those focusing on the 1903’s front post while sighting with the aperture.  But with the orange bullseyes (like you see in the target above), I might as well have been shooting at night.  I returned to the range a few days later and shot at 100 yards with the jacketed 150-grain Winchester bullets (with the 48.0-grain IMR 4064 load), the 210-grain cast Montana bullets (with the 17.0-grain Trail Boss load), and the 168-grain Speer match bullets (with a 48.0 grain IMR 4064 load).

Using the rear sight aperture, I shot the target below at 100 yards with the 150-grain Winchester jacketed bullet and 48.0 grains of IMR 4064.  I was pleased with the results and I quit after 3 shots (I didn’t want to screw up the group).

Three shots into an inch and three quarters at 100 yards. The load was 48.0 grains of IMR 4064 and the Winchester 150-grain jacketed soft point bullet.  Old eyes and an even older rifle sometimes do great things.  My rifle was manufactured in 1918; I was born in 1951.

I then shot at another 100-yard target with the 210-grain Montana cast bullet (these were loaded with 17.0 grains of Trail Boss).  I used the rear sight’s lower notch for this target.  Hmm, what do you know…the elevation was about perfect without moving anything on the rear sight.

Another 100 yard target, this time with the Montana 210-grain cast bullet and 17.0 grains of Trail Boss. I used the rear sight notch immediately above the aperture without making any adjustments. This is a real sweetheart load with minimal muzzle blast, almost no recoil, and no leading. The cast bullets are not as accurate at 100 yards as are the jacketed bullets, but they are still pretty good.

Finally, I fired eight rounds originally loaded for the Garand (I reload for the Garand in multiples of eight, as that’s what a clip holds), returning again to the rear sight aperture. This load used the 168-grain Speer jacketed boattail hollowpoint bullet and 48.0 grains of IMR 4064 propellant.  The Speer bullets are almost identical to the Sierra match bullet, but the Speer’s ogive is slighly different and it has less bearing area in the barrel.  I called the wizards at Speer about that and they recommended going to a heavier charge than would be used with the comparable Sierra bullet (they specifically recommended 48.0 grains of IMR 4064 for the Garand).  That load was a little warm in the 1903 (the recoil was significantly more than the 150-grain Winchester bullet and the primers had slight flattening).  But it was reasonably accurate.

Eight rounds of .30 06 ammo loaded for the Garand, using the 1903 rear sight aperture, at 100 yards. The astute blogophile will note there appears to be only seven holes; the hole just outside the 10-ring had two bullets pass through it.

My observations and conclusions from the above are:

    • The 1903 Springfield rear sight is needlessly complex for an infantry rifle.  You may feel differently.  Hey, go start your own blog.
    • With my cast bullet loads, there was no leading.   My cast bullets had gas checks (the little copper cup on the bullet base), which helps to prevent leading.
    • The Lyman cast bullet book showed a minimal 5744 load to be the accuracy load for the 210-grain Montana cast bullet.  I did not find that to be the case.
    • Both the Hursman 173-grain and the Montana 210-grain cast bullets were extremely accurate with 17.0 grains of Trail Boss, at least at 50 yards.
    • The Winchester 150-grain jacketed bullet accuracy load, per the Lyman manual, was with 48.0 grains of IMR 4064.  I found this to be a very accurate load.  I didn’t do a lot of work developing a jacketed bullet load.  I’m going to stick with this one for this rifle.
    • Orange bullseyes and aperture rear sights don’t work with my old eyes at 100 yards.  They are okay at 50 yards, but not 100 yards.
    • Both of the jacketed bullet loads I tried (the Speer Garand load and the Lyman 150-grain accuracy load) are accurate.  Without adjusting the rear sight from the 150-grain jacketed bullet setting, the Garand load shoots a little high and to the right, but the group size would fit into the bullseye if the sights were adjusted.
    • The cast bullets are not as accurate as the jacketed bullets at 100 yards.  The cast bullets are comparabily accurate to jacketed bullets at 50 yards, but not at 100.

With regard to shooting both cast and jacketed bullets in the same rifle, I got lucky:  As complicated as that 1903 Springfield rear sight is, I found that one rear sight position shoots to the same point of impact at 100 yards for both my cast bullet accuracy load and my jacketed bullet accuracy load.  Yep, you read that right.  With the rear sight crossbar secured as you see in the photo below, I can use the aperture (denoted by the right arrow) with the 150-grain jacketed bullet load.  Or, I can use the lower crossbar notch (denoted by the left arrow) with the 210-grain cast bullet, 17.0 grains of Trail Boss load.  Both will shoot to the same point of impact at 100 yards.  A friend asked if I tuned the loads to do this.  I wish I could say I had that kind of load development expertise.  Nope, I just got lucky.

One size fits all (sort of). With the 1903’s rear sight in the raised position, I use the notch denoted by the arrow on the left for my cast bullet accuracy load at 100 yards. I use the aperature denoted by the arrow on the right for the 150-grain jacketed bullet load at 100 yards. I don’t need to move the rear sight cross bar up or down.  Sometimes you just get lucky.

One final note that’s sure to set the Internet on fire:  I know this is heresy.  As much as I like my 1903, I think the 91/30 Mosin Nagant is a better rifle. My Mosin groups better at 1oo yards.  But that’s a story for another blog.

Never miss an ExNotes blog:

Tales of the Gun: 1911s, revolvers, 9mm semi-autos, bolt action sporters, milsurps, reloading, big bore rifles, and more.  It’s all right here!

Click on those popups, folks!  It’s what pays the rent!

An Eleanor Update

You’ll recall a recent blog where I waxed eloquent about Eleanor, my Ruger RSM .416 Rigby rifle.   In that blog, I talked about reduced loads using 350-grain cast Montana bullets and 5744 and Trail Boss propellant.  It was fun…the Trail Boss loads had milder recoil and “good enough” (but not stellar) accuracy.  Take a look at these 50-yard targets:

The above target on the left was with 30.0 grains of Trail Boss; the one on the right was with 34.0 grains of Trail Boss.  I could feel a tiny bit more recoil with the 34.0-grain load, but both were light loads with modest recoil.   Weirdly, the point of impact shifted sharply to the right with the lighter load, but it moved back to the center with the 34.0-grain load (and it was slightly higher).  The Trail Boss loads shot okay, but they weren’t running in the same league as the load I had shot the prior week with 5744 propellant and the same Montana Bullet Works 350-grain bullet, as you can see from the 50-yard targets below.

I could see what I was getting with the Trail Boss and I could see that it wasn’t grouping nearly as well as the 5744 loads at 50 yards, so that stopped my testing with Trail Boss (that, and the fact that I had used up all my Trail Boss cartridges).

I was curious:  How would Eleanor do at 100 yards?  I still had some of the 5744 loads left, so I posted a couple of 100-yard targets and let Eleanor have her way.  I first fired a 3-shot group and after looking through my spotting scope, I was surprised to see how well they grouped.

I thought maybe that target was a random success, and I didn’t want to ruin it by throwing more shots at it.  So I fired another 3-shot group at the second target, and then another three at that same target.  That’s the one you see below.

Before all you keyboard commandos start telling me that these results are nothing special, allow me to point out that these are 100-yard groups using  open sights on an elephant rifle.   I’m calling it good to go.  Like I said earlier, when the elephants become an invasive species here in So Cal, I’m ready.   The load is 45.0 grains of 5744 (it’s the load the Lyman Cast Bullet Handbook specified as the accuracy load, and they were right), the 350-grain Montana Bullet Works .416 bullet sized to .417 and crimped in the cannelure, Hornady brass, and a CCI-200 primer.  I didn’t weigh each charge; I just adjusted my RCBS powder dispenser and cranked them out.  If you were wondering, I use Lyman dies for this cartridge.

A bit more about Eleanor:  The rifle is a Ruger 77 that the good folks from New Hampshire call an Express or RSM model (I think RSM stood for Ruger Safari Magnum).  They made them in 375 H&H, 416 Rigby, and 458 Lott (kind of a magnum .458 Magnum).  Ruger also made a similar one in a few of the standard calibers (7mm Mag, 30 06, and 300 Win Mag, and maybe one or two others).  These rifles were a bit pricey when Ruger sold them in the late 1990s/early 2000s, but evidently not pricey enough.  They were too expensive to manufacture, so Ruger stopped making them.  When you see these rifles come up for sale today (which doesn’t happen very often), they command a premium.  I wish I had bought one in 30 06 when they were first offered; to me, that would be the perfect rifle.

The rear sight on a Ruger RSM rifle is of the African “Express” style.  The elevation adjustment consists of a fixed and two flip-up blades, and they all have a very shallow V.  I guess the idea of that shallow V is that it lets you see more in case an elephant is charging.  The sight has two flip up blades behind the fixed blade; as range increases, you flip up the second blade, and if it is an even longer shot, you go for the third blade.  I got lucky, for me, the fixed rear sight blade is perfect with this load.  I made a minor adjustment for windage, and the elevation is spot on with a 6:00 hold at both 50 yards and 100 yards.

Incidentally, that rib the rear sight sits on?  It’s not a separate piece.  It and the barrel were turned and milled from one solid piece of steel.  It’s one of the reasons these rifles were too expensive to manufacture.

The front sight is the typical brass bead (you can sort of see it in the featured photo at the top of this blog), which I usually don’t like, but with these results I can’t complain.  I’ve shot better groups with two or three other open sight rifles using jacketed bullets at 100 yards; this is the best any cast bullet has ever done for me.

Want to see the first installment of the Eleanor story?  It’s right here.

Check out our other guns and reloading articles here.

Tough to get to a gunstore to buy targets?  Range fees for targets too high? Do what I do and order them online.  They’re delivered right to your door and they’re less expensive, too.

Need a calipers for measuring your group size?  This is a great place to find great calipers at a great price.

Want to check out Montana Bullets?   Here’s a link to their website.  Tell them Joe sent you.  Trust me on this:  These are best cast bullets I’ve ever used.

Never miss an ExNotes blog! Subscribe for free!